No exit.
As I write this Monday morning, Donald Trump has made few public appearances since he and Benjamin Netanyahu launched this war.
But his Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is out front assuring us: “This is not Iraq. This is not endless.”
Hegseth says the operation has a “clear, devastating, decisive mission” — destroy Iran’s missile threat, cripple its navy, ensure “no nukes.”
“No stupid rules of engagement, no nation building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars. We fight to win, and we don’t waste time or lives.”
When asked whether there are boots on the ground in Iran, he replied: “No, but we’re not going to go into the exercise of what we will or will not do.”
Pressed further, he dismissed it as “foolishness” to expect officials to say publicly “here’s exactly how far we’ll go.”
That is some major tap dancing.
Because what he’s really saying is trust us.
When Trump launched Operation Epic Fury, his own statements blended hard threats with soft assurances. He vowed to continue military operations until “all objectives” were achieved and warned that more U.S. casualties were likely. At the same time, he floated “off-ramps” and suggested the campaign could be limited.
Strength and ambiguity.
Escalation and exit.
Victory and vagueness.
By combining aggressive language with hints of short timelines and diplomatic openings, Trump is walking a tightrope — satisfying Republican hawks who demand decisive action while calming “America First” voters who once opposed open-ended wars. It’s an attempt to hold together interventionists and non-interventionists under one banner.
Will it work?
It rallies the base around American strength. It pressures Democrats to avoid appearing unpatriotic. And it shifts media attention from policy detail to war imagery.
*Like this post if you do. Consider upgrading to a paid subscription.